Ballot Questions to Amend Frederick County's Charter

Frederick County voters can weigh in on two ballot questions that could affect the County's Charter. 

Question A: Supplemental Appropriations

Question A would require the County Council to hold a public hearing on any budget appropriation (spending) over $1 million that is made after the budget is adopted. This is referred to as a supplemental appropriation.

How it works now: 

The Charter requires the County Executive to host one public hearing in December and another in March before introducing a proposed budget by April 15. After the budget is introduced, the County Council is required to hold a public hearing. 

Throughout the year, the County Executive can introduce supplemental appropriations to the County Council for the Council's authorization. The County Council is not required to hold a public hearing on supplemental appropriations before voting on them.

How it would change:

If the ballot question passes, the County Council would be required to hold a public hearing on any supplemental appropriation to the general fund that exceeds $1 million. 

The Administration's position:

County Executive Jessica Fitzwater’s Administration supports Question A. The amendment would increase opportunities for public participation in the County’s budget process. Because the change will only apply to large appropriations (exceeding $1 million), it would not have a significant impact on County processes.  

Question B: Appointment and Removal of Department Heads and Others

Question B would allow the County Council to remove an appointed head of a division, agency, or office upon the affirmative vote of five council members following a public hearing on the matter.

How it works now: 

Heads of divisions, some departments, and agencies are appointed by the County Executive and confirmed by the County Council. They serve at the County Executive's pleasure. The Charter does not give the Council a role in removing appointees.

How it would change:

If the ballot question passes, the Council would have the power to remove appointed staff with a vote of five or more Council Members. 

The Administration's position:

County Executive Jessica Fitzwater’s Administration opposed Question B. The amendment has the potential to disrupt day-to-day operations and county services that many residents rely on each day by giving a legislative body power to remove division heads.